Syndicated Columnist

Most North Carolina voters, regardless of registration, cast their ballots consistently for either Democrats or Republicans. And the swing voters who often determine electoral outcomes tend to cast their ballots against what they dislike more than they cast ballots for what they like.

If you follow politics, these are pretty good rules. They have a lot of empirical support. They make conceptual sense. They are useful in predicting the future. And they are all you need to understand why Donald Trump won the electoral votes of North Carolina — and of enough states in the union to become president.

As you may already know, I’m hardly a Trump fan. But I don’t think you have to come up with elaborate conspiracies, race-conscious heuristics, or savage attacks on the Hillary Clinton campaign to explain the outcome of the 2016 elections.

By traditional political (and conservative) standards, Trump was a horrible candidate. Clinton was a horrible candidate, too. Most Republican-leaning voters, whether they liked Trump or not, voted for him because they strongly questioned both the character and the policies of the Democratic nominee. Most Democratic-leaning voters, even if they didn’t much like Clinton, could never have brought themselves to pick Trump.

As for swing voters in the final weeks of the campaign, more of them swung to Trump in key states — such as Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin — than swung to Clinton in those or other battlegrounds. I suspect news about the email investigation played a role, as did tactical mistakes by the Clinton team and good tactical calls by the Trump team. It was a close election. It was consequential. But the election result hardly represents something brand new and inexplicable in our politics.

I was mistaken in expecting Trump to lose the key states he ended up winning. But I always figured that, if he won, his victory wouldn’t bring a strong Republican wave. It didn’t. The GOP lost ground in both houses of Congress, although it did better in state and local elections where the races were less connected to the national narrative.

I also figured that, if Trump became president, he’d struggle to maintain public goodwill and support, even in his inaugural year. So far, that is precisely what has happened.

Consider two newly released surveys of North Carolina voters. In an Elon University Poll, 34 percent said they approved of President Trump’s job performance as president, with 58 percent disapproving. In a Survey USA poll for the statewide Spectrum News cable channel, the figures were 37 percent approval and 49 percent disapproval.

When I looked more closely at the crosstabs — the results broken out by voter groups — the discrepancy between the two polls shrank a bit. Republicans, Democrats, and unaffiliated voters expressed similar sentiments across the two surveys. But the Survey USA sample had more Republicans than the Elon sample did.

The Survey USA poll produced another fascinating result. Respondents were asked whether, if they had it to do over again, they’d vote the same way for president as they did last fall. The vast majority of Republicans, Democrats, and independents said their votes would be the same. Somewhat more of the minority who would switch their votes — or who didn’t vote in 2016 — said they’d choose Clinton over Trump, but not enough to change the outcome.

In other words, the poll suggested that if the election of 2016 were re-staged in North Carolina, Trump would probably still win the state.

Surprised? Confused? Outraged? Well, yes, Trump’s approval ratings are low in North Carolina (as in the nation as a whole). But again, elections are about comparisons. Most voters are partisans. They believe their parties offer the best ideas for governing the country. They think the other party’s ideas are wrongheaded or even dangerous. It takes an awful lot to get them to overlook that, at least when it comes to federal elections where the stakes are highest.

And many swing voters still, it seems, dislike and distrust Hillary Clinton. They get to do that.

John Hood is chairman of the John Locke Foundation and appears on the talk show “NC SPIN.” You can follow him @JohnHoodNC.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.